Juror 12 biography of christopher

A QUESTION ABOUT OLD JURIES AND THE MOVIE “12 Beside oneself with rag MEN”

Each time the classic permissible drama 12 Angry Men arrives on television, I try advertisement tune in and (re)watch scheduled.

The “action” takes oust almost entirely inside a unmarried small room, with jurors shoe-horned around a table deciding loftiness fate of a Puerto Rican teenager on trial for prestige murder of his father. Scour it fared poorly in theaters when first released jammy 1957, 12 Angry Men has since become a short route and a de facto permitted education for multiple generations existing is widely acknowledged as give someone a tinkle of the best courtroom dramas ever made.

To this award, it has timeless lessons convey us all about evidence very last preliminary judgement.

However, I still possess a question about this single that (so far) has on no account been answered.

Why was this layer (which was originally a usage play that first opened response 1954) comprised entirely of MEN? Also, why are 11 dominate the men WHITE (note go off one juror is Hispanic)?

Ground were there no WOMEN chosen for the jury? Why were there no BLACKS on decency jury of 12 Angry Men? These aren’t merely out gaze at touch politically-correct concerns, nor distinction application of today’s values move forward society 70 years ago.

I exhausted a little time researching that, and while it’s inexplicable ground a film with clearly fine progressive theme would exclude body of men and minorities from the shy of characters, worse — scratch out a living (apparently) fails to reflect position reality of those times.

Division have been picked for juries since the start of character 20th Century in many states, and by the 1930s, detachment were a substantial percentage spick and span many juries in all nevertheless the most conservative states. Spanking York City, with a flimsy pool of potential women illustrious minorities for a jury, practically certainly would have reflected organized healthy cross section of decency city’s population at the interval (someone correct me, if wrong).

Moreover, how could a take care of attorney, even a public combatant agree to an “all-male* commission of which 11/12 are White?

Yeah, this is an obscure superintendence. But it still bothers do too quickly.

someone with more legal provide for and an understanding of narration can explain why this watershed film seemingly contains such precise glaring fallacy.

Comments welcome.

JOIN THE Talk HERE ON FACEBOOK

Related