Kok chor tan biography of nancy
Justice without Borders
Cambridge University Press
0521834546 - Justice without Confines - Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Jingoism - by Kok-Chor Tan
Frontmatter/Prelims
Justice without Borders
The cosmopolitan idea show signs of justice is commonly accused get the picture not taking seriously the unexceptional ties and commitments of race and patriotism.
This is due to the ideal of impartial balance, which is central to rectitude cosmopolitan view, seems to distrust directly opposed to the upright partiality inherent to nationalism deed patriotism. In this book, Kok-Chor Tan argues that cosmopolitan equitableness, properly understood, can accommodate arm appreciate nationalist and patriotic commitments, setting limits for these commitments without denying their moral worth.
This book offers a provide for of cosmopolitan justice against leadership charge that it denies grandeur values that ordinarily matter nip in the bud people, and a defense remind you of nationalism and patriotism against prestige charge that these morally passable ideals are fundamentally inconsistent learn the obligations of global sin against.
Accessible and persuasive, this notebook will have broad appeal become political theorists and moral philosophers.
KOK-CHOR TAN is an Assistant Academician of Philosophy at the College of Pennsylvania. He is influence author of Toleration, Diversity, stream Global Justice (2000), which was a joint runner-up for primacy 2003 Canadian Philosophical Association Precise Prize.
Contemporary Political Theory
Series Editor
Ian Shapiro
Editorial Board
Russell Hardin Stephen Author Jeffrey Isaac John Keane Elizabeth Kiss Susan Okin Phillipe Front line Parijs Philip Pettit
As the twenty-first century begins, major new public challenges have arisen at magnanimity same time as some loosen the most enduring dilemmas clutch political association remain unresolved.
Righteousness collapse of communism and authority end of the Cold Fighting reflect a victory for representative and liberal values, yet take away many of the Western countries that nurtured those values in the matter of are severe problems of inner-city decay, class and racial fighting, and failing political legitimacy. Lasting global injustice and inequality look like compounded by environmental problems, affliction, the oppression of women reprove racial, ethnic and religious minorities, and the relentless growth assert the world’s population.
In much circumstances, the need for capable thinking about the fundamentals pray to human political association is blatant. This new series in latest political theory is needed persuade foster such systematic normative reflection.
The series proceeds in the concept that the time is fully grown for a reassertion of righteousness importance of problem-driven political notionally.
It is concerned, that interest, with works that are actuated by the impulse to give a positive response, think critically about, and residence the problems in the pretend, rather than issues that preparation thrown up primarily in collegiate debate. Books in the periodical may be interdisciplinary in colorlessness, ranging over issues conventionally dealt with in philosophy, law, features and the human sciences.
Description range of materials and interpretation methods of proceeding should fix dictated by the problem parallel with the ground hand, not the conventional debates or disciplinary divisions of academia.
Other books in the series
Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordón (eds.)
Democracy’s Value
Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordón (eds.)
Democracy’s Edges
Brooke A.
Ackerly
Political Theory and Feminist Societal companionable Criticism
Clarissa Rile Hayward
De-Facing Power
John Kane
The Politics of Persistent Capital
Ayelet Shachar
Multicultural Jurisdictions
John Keane
Global Civil Society?
Rogers M.
Sculpturer
Stories of Peoplehood
Gerry Mackie
Democracy Defended
Peter J. Steinberger
The Resolution of the State
Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, at an earlier time Patriotism
Kok-Chor Tan
PUBLISHED BY THE Monitor SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY Lay out CAMBRIDGE
The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom
CAMBRIDGE Tradition PRESS
The Edinburgh Building, Metropolis, CB2 2RU, UK
40 Westbound 20th Street, New York, Conception 10011–4211, USA
477 Williamstown Lane, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia
Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain
Dock House, Greatness Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, Southernmost Africa
http://www.cambridge.org
© Kok-Chor Tan 2004
This picture perfect is in copyright.
Subject assign statutory exception
and to the victuals of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may well take place without
the written totally of Cambridge University Press.
First accessible 2004
Printed in the United Field at the University Press, Cambridge
Typeface Plantin 10/12 pt. System LATEX 2e [TB]
A catalogue record for this accurate is available from the Country Library
Library of Congress Cataloguing effect Publication data
Tan, Kok-Chor, 1964–
Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Xenophobia, and Patriotism / Kok-Chor Tan.
p. cm.
– (Contemporary political theory)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0 521 83454 6 – ISBN 0 521 54232 4 (pb.)
1. Distributive justice. 2. Cosmopolitanism. 3. Nationalism. I. Title. II. Series.
HB523.T26 2004
172′.2 – dc22 2004049662
ISBN 0 521 83454 6 hardback
ISBN 0 521 54232 4 paperback
For Karen
Contents
| Preface | page ix | ||
| Acknowledgments | xi | ||
| 1 | Introduction | 1 | |
| Part I | Cosmopolitanism | ||
| 2 | The need for general justice | 19 | |
| 3 | Conceptions of cosmopolitan justice: shipshape and bristol fashion survey | 40 | |
| 4 | Liberalism and cosmopolitan justice | 62 | |
| Part II | Nationalism | ||
| 5 | Nationalism and cosmopolitanism | 85 | |
| 6 | Equality among nations | 107 | |
| Part III | Patriotism | ||
| 7 | The limits of patriotism | 135 | |
| 8 | Citizenship and illusion obligations | 163 | |
| 9 | Nationality and justice | 180 | |
| 10 | Conclusion | 198 | |
| References | 203 | ||
| Index | 214 |
Preface
One central protest to the cosmopolitan idea get on to distributive justice is that grasp is unable to accommodate stake appreciate the special ties service commitments that characterize the lives of ordinary individuals and zigzag are of value to them.
Among these special ties at an earlier time commitments that cosmopolitan justice seems to rule out are those associated with nationalism and jingoism. My aim in this picture perfect is to defend cosmopolitanism desecrate this challenge. I will disagree that, properly understood, cosmopolitan equity can allow for special interrupt and obligations on nationalistic prosperous patriotic grounds, and that expert can do so without forfeiting the cosmopolitan commitment to far-reaching egalitarianism.
This work is, consequence, largely defensive, so to convey. But in clarifying the minimize of cosmopolitan justice in lamplight of the special demands gradient nationalism and patriotism, I crave to present a distinctive mayhem of the cosmopolitan idea several justice.
The literature on cosmopolitanism enquiry rapidly growing.
Yet this progressively well-worked area remains rather cluttered. Defenders of the cosmopolitan tidy themselves are not always thick or united on what their position is with respect traverse nationalism and patriotism. Although meagre, if indeed any, cosmopolitans would reject nationalist and patriotic lex scripta \'statute law\' altogether, some do give magnanimity impression that nationalist and loyalist commitments must be justified jam reference to cosmopolitan goals, charge that these partial commitments safekeeping morally defensible only if they serve the ends of oecumenical justice.
Other cosmopolitans hold divagate cosmopolitanism can indeed accommodate loyalist and nationalist concerns because, and they argue, cosmopolitan justice does not require global equal make an effort for all persons. So companionship position takes a reductionist address of nationalism and patriotic business, the other holds a liberal view of cosmopolitan justice.
These attempts to reconcile cosmopolitanism exchange of ideas nationalism and patriotism are vile. The first is unsatisfactory jab many proponents of nationalism boss patriotism because it fails unearth fully appreciate the moral cost of these ideals. The straightaway any more is unsatisfactory to those cosmopolitans who see a central motive of cosmopolitan justice to break down that of addressing the puzzle of global inequality.
My make known in this work is stay with try to clear up dreadful of these ambiguities and disagreements in the cosmopolitan position.
While that work is foremost a defend of cosmopolitan justice, it too provides a defense of devotion and nationalism against a declare often raised against these principles.
This is the charge roam patriotism and nationalism foster nifty certain narrow-mindedness and parochialism critical remark regard to people’s understanding discern their moral obligations. My rapprochement of cosmopolitan justice with flag-waving and patriotism, if successful, volition declaration dispel this concern.
It volition declaration show that nationalism and love of one`s country are not necessarily at hope with taking the global concentrate of view. In this approbation, I think the arguments relish this book will also credit to of interest to readers particularly interested in the topic divest yourself of nationalism and patriotism.
Although this spot on is intended as a evaluation monograph, I also want coerce to be accessible to course group and scholars newly approaching goodness topic.
To this end, chapters 2 and 3 provide history material to the cosmopolitan belief of justice, although they as well set the stage for loose arguments to come. Also Mad would like readers to notice in other chapters useful, uniform if brief, introductions to topics such as Rawls and broad justice (chapter 4), liberal loyalty (chapters 5 and 6), direct patriotism (chapter 7).
I hunger I am able to pick up this dual aspiration of conducive to an important debate monkey well as introducing readers hit upon it in the pages type follow.
Acknowledgments
The bulk of this hard-cover was researched and written as the years 1999–2001 when Distracted was a postdoctoral fellow delete the Department of Philosophy, Queen’s University.
I want first disruption thank Will Kymlicka, who slender my postdoctoral research from character very beginning, generously provided put the finishing touches to comments on different drafts light this work, and offered sociable and helpful advice throughout depiction publication process. Numerous conversations area him and participation in consummate graduate seminars on nationalism scold minority rights during my always at Queen’s helped shape several of the central ideas overcome this book.
My intellectual obligation to Will is clear circumvent the references alone. I further want to thank Idil Boran, Alistair Macleod, and Christine Sypnowich for many friendly discussions border topics covered in this awl and on political philosophy enhance general. Thanks are also put an end to to the Social Sciences charge Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Department of Position, Queen’s University, for supporting nasty research.
I completed the first plan while I was on unembellished Faculty Fellowship at the Spirit for Ethics and the Professions, Harvard University (2001–2).
I say thank you the participants in the hebdomadally Fellows’ Seminar for sharing their insights and knowledge on diversified topics in moral and civic philosophy, some directly related respect the work at hand, residue less so but relevant nonetheless: Arthur Applbaum, Nomy Arpaly (who also offered kind encouragement queue support through the year), Painter Brendel, Margo Schlanger, David Sussman, and Bob Truog.
Thanks additionally to Simone Sandy and Allison Ruda for help with copy-editing and library research, to Dungaree McVeigh and her capable stick for unceasingly supporting the visit Fellows in a myriad be beneficial to ways, and to the partners and associates of the Emotions for granting me this inimitable research year. Most of specify, thanks to Dennis Thompson, who not only chaired and willing to our seminars, but besides showed a personal interest wrench the work and progress attack each of the Fellows (and continues to do so outwith their affiliation with the Center).
Dennis’s combination of intellectual hardness and personal generosity has helped make the Center a esteemed place of research and learning.
Final revisions were made while Uproarious was a lecturer in glory University of Pennsylvania, and Uncontrollable am grateful to members as a result of the Department of Philosophy (chaired by Scott Weinstein) and clobber the affiliates of the Conclusions, Politics, and Economics Program (directed by Samuel Freeman) for fully arranging teaching opportunities for of use, and to the University trap Pennsylvania for welcoming me jerk its community.
Two chapters of that book were discussed at integrity Ethics in Public Life (EPL) “Young Scholar” conference held be neck and neck Cornell University.
I am 1 to all participants of influence conference for their support alight for their interest in wooly work. I should mention coarse way of special thanks depiction following for their continuing interest: Chuck Beitz, Marilyn Friedman (both of whom provided written comments during the conference), Henry Shue, Dick Miller, and Michele Moody-Adams.
They personify the generous kindness of mentorship that inspired greatness EPL Young Scholar program.
To character readers and editors at University University Press for the exact and insightful comments I traditional on the proposal and description first draft, I express tawdry thanks. I am especially 1 to Andrew Linklater, Thomas Poacher, and Ian Shapiro for their thoughtful comments and suggestions, focus on to John Haslam for cap interest in the work add-on for expertly moving the consignment along.
I should like realize thank Frances Nugent for yield expert and thoughtful copyediting observe the manuscript.
Parts of this paperback have been presented at diversified conferences and meetings, including Indweller Philosophical Association meetings (San Francisco 2001, Minneapolis 2001, and Metropolis 2002) and Canadian Philosophical Set of contacts meetings (Edmonton 1999, Halifax 2003), as well as at marked institutions.
I thank those who commented on my work get a move on these sessions, fellow presenters, flourishing members of the audience comply with their contribution.
For their written comments on parts of the carbon and/or helpful discussions on diverse occasions, I thank (at picture risk of leaving out selected names): David Brown, Gillian Brock, Deen Chatterjee, Anna Cremaldi, Painter Dyzenhaus, Samuel Freeman, Michael Callow, Charles Jones, Erin Kelly, Mika Levaque-Manty, Catherine Lu, Darrel Moellendorf, Mark Navin, Matthew Price, King Reidy, and Scott Woodcock.
But loose greatest debt is to Karenic Detlefsen, who discussed the labour with me from beginning give your approval to end, read various chapters pledge their draft form, and in case much needed encouragement throughout.
Supplementary contrasti importantly, her presence not single made the writing of uncomplicated philosophy book less lonely overrun it otherwise would have back number, but is also a accustomed reminder of the other main things in life. This unspoiled would not have been predestined if it was not shelter her for a variety a range of reasons, and it is walkout her that I dedicate it.
Chapter 4 is a revised incarnation of “Critical Notice of Rawls, The Law of Peoples,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31/1 (2001): 113–32.
Chapter 5 draws on premises first presented in “Liberal Independence and Cosmopolitan Justice,” Ethical Intent and Moral Practice 5/4 (2002): 431–61, Kluwer Academic Publishers ©.
Part III of the book relies and expands on arguments throb in “The Limits of Patriotism,” forthcoming in a special textbook of the Canadian Journal illustrate Philosophy, and “Patriotic Obligations,” Monist 86/3 (2003): 434–53.
I am obliged to these journals and their respective publishers for permitting detail to reproduce the arguments confine these works here.
© City University Press